Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 01:10:47PM -0600, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>> It may be better to just say "relational".
> I guess if I had to name this with no precedence, I would call it
> relational/extendable, but that seems even worse that what we have.
Call it an "extensible relational database"? I agree that the
"object" part is out of date and no longer much of a focal point.
regards, tom lane