Re: Describing Postgres as "object-relational" on the home page

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)karlpinc(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Describing Postgres as "object-relational" on the home page
Date: 2023-12-26 21:21:06
Message-ID: 2321548.1703625666@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 01:10:47PM -0600, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>> It may be better to just say "relational".

> I guess if I had to name this with no precedence, I would call it
> relational/extendable, but that seems even worse that what we have.

Call it an "extensible relational database"? I agree that the
"object" part is out of date and no longer much of a focal point.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vik Fearing 2023-12-26 21:49:16 Re: Describing Postgres as "object-relational" on the home page
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2023-12-26 20:17:41 Re: Describing Postgres as "object-relational" on the home page