Re: New version numbering practices

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New version numbering practices
Date: 2016-08-03 16:02:29
Message-ID: 2320825c-0ca2-08a3-2cd3-4b0db234ac6d@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/1/16 9:10 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I don't see any value to the _STABLE
> suffix, given the way we treat branches.

It would be nice to be able to tell easily from convention whether
something is a branch or a tag.

Anyway, this is a question for many months from now.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vladimir Sitnikov 2016-08-03 16:09:28 Re: Slowness of extended protocol
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-08-03 16:00:33 Re: Possible duplicate release of buffer lock.