From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "splarv(at)ya(dot)ru" <splarv(at)ya(dot)ru>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Savepoints in plpgsql |
Date: | 2024-07-12 13:42:24 |
Message-ID: | 2320320.1720791744@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thursday, July 11, 2024, PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> wrote:
>> In this section nothing mentioned that a savepoint (a subtransaction) will
>> not work inside plpgsql.
> Correct, we prefer to just document how things work. 43.2 does mention
> that blocks form subtransactions.
It probably would be reasonable to mention something about this
in 43.8, if only to provide an excuse to cross-reference 43.6.8.
I'm imagining more or less
PL/pgSQL does not support savepoints (SAVEPOINT/ROLLBACK TO
SAVEPOINT/RELEASE SAVEPOINT commands). Typical usage patterns
for savepoints can be replaced by blocks with exception handlers
(see 43.6.8).
I also notice the last para
A transaction cannot be ended inside a block with exception handlers.
which seems like it could be tied into that somehow. Maybe eliminate
that as a separate para, and write
PL/pgSQL does not support savepoints (SAVEPOINT/ROLLBACK TO
SAVEPOINT/RELEASE SAVEPOINT commands). Typical usage patterns
for savepoints can be replaced by blocks with exception handlers
(see 43.6.8). Under the hood, a block with exception handlers
forms a subtransaction, which means that transactions cannot
be ended inside such a block.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2024-07-14 06:17:37 | 13.2.1. Read Committed Isolation Level |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2024-07-12 13:15:20 | Re: Savepoints in plpgsql |