From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Subject: | Re: Review remove {join, from}_collapse_limit, add enable_join_ordering |
Date: | 2009-07-16 13:13:02 |
Message-ID: | 23200.1247749982@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> The queries on the second reporting schema unfortunately are different. Its the
> one were I copied the crazy example I attached in the original thread.
> With geqo=off a good part of the queries used daily use too much memory to plan
> sensibly and geqo=on outright fails with:
> "Error: Failed to make a valid plan"
> on some.
We're not going to be able to fix this unless you show us examples.
> Noticeable even some plans which were plannable in reasonable time before now
> are problematic with enable_join_ordering=false!
And this even more so --- it doesn't make any sense at all.
> So, while I think the changes are principally a good idea, as
> {from,join}_collapse_limit are a bit confusing options, I personally! do not
> think geqo is ready for it today, especially as the benefit is relatively
> small.
In general I think that any such bugs are there anyway and need to be
fixed anyway.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2009-07-16 13:18:01 | Re: Review remove {join, from}_collapse_limit, add enable_join_ordering |
Previous Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2009-07-16 13:05:52 | Re: slow count in window query |