Re: Some more information_schema issues

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Some more information_schema issues
Date: 2003-10-17 15:45:14
Message-ID: 23197.1066405514@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> We could check the first character of the definition, and if it isn't a
> left parenthesis, then we add parentheses.

And we would be wrong. Consider
(a < 0) and (b > 0)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-10-17 15:53:52 Re: Some thoughts about i/o priorities and throttling vacuum
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2003-10-17 15:36:00 Re: Some thoughts about i/o priorities and throttling vacuum