From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Vincent Lachenal <vincent(dot)lachenal(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14897: Segfault on statitics SQL request |
Date: | 2017-11-14 05:31:35 |
Message-ID: | 23171.1510637495@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Concretely, the attached patch fixes it for me. I've verified by
>> examining the assembly code that this stops gcc from using movdqa or
>> movaps in numeric.c, except for one place where it apparently can
>> prove that it's dealing with a sufficiently-aligned local variable.
> I am not seeing any difference in the assembly code generated by gcc
> -S with and without your patch. Perhaps I am missing something? What
> are you actually seeing?
Hm, double-check your procedure. I get this:
$ diff numeric.s.std numeric.s.patch
2746c2746
< movaps %xmm0, (%r14)
---
> movups %xmm0, (%r14)
13948,13951c13948,13951
< movdqa 16(%rbp), %xmm0
< movaps %xmm0, 16(%rax)
< movdqa 32(%rbp), %xmm0
< movaps %xmm0, 32(%rax)
---
> movdqu 16(%rbp), %xmm0
> movups %xmm0, 16(%rax)
> movdqu 32(%rbp), %xmm0
> movups %xmm0, 32(%rax)
14434,14435c14434,14435
< movdqa 16(%rbp), %xmm0
< movaps %xmm0, 16(%rax)
---
> movdqu 16(%rbp), %xmm0
> movups %xmm0, 16(%rax)
(If using -g, there are a bunch more diffs in the debug tables.)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-11-14 06:16:34 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14897: Segfault on statitics SQL request |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-11-14 05:20:25 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14897: Segfault on statitics SQL request |