Re: probelm with alter table add constraint......

From: roopabenzer <roopabenzer(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: probelm with alter table add constraint......
Date: 2009-04-22 07:16:12
Message-ID: 23170924.post@talk.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Tom Lane-2 wrote:
>
> "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> writes:
>> roopasatish wrote:
>>> I have an issue with the add foreign key constraint which
>>> goes for waiting and locks other queries as well.
>>>
>>> ALTER TABLE ONLY holding_positions ADD CONSTRAINT
>>> holding_positions_stock_id_fkey FOREIGN KEY (stock_id)
>>> REFERENCES stocks (stock_id) MATCH SIMPLE
>>> ON UPDATE NO ACTION ON DELETE NO ACTION;
>>>
>>> The holding_positions table has no data in it as yet.
>
>> Look in pg_catalog.pg_locks for a second transaction that
>> holds a lock on the table holding_positions.
>
> This statement also needs to get lock on the referenced table "stocks".
> An open transaction that's referenced either table will block it.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>
>

I can't lock the table 'stocks' as its used continuously by many users. Is
there a way to run the constraint in a background without affecting the
users using the database.

Thanks a lot in advance
Roopa
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/probelm-with-alter-table-add-constraint......-tp22903334p23170924.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2009-04-22 12:19:28 Re: performance for high-volume log insertion
Previous Message James Mansion 2009-04-22 05:26:07 Re: performance for high-volume log insertion