Re: Slow queries on 9.3.1 despite use of index

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael van Rooyen <michael(at)loot(dot)co(dot)za>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Slow queries on 9.3.1 despite use of index
Date: 2014-04-28 17:50:20
Message-ID: 23166.1398707420@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Michael van Rooyen <michael(at)loot(dot)co(dot)za> writes:
> I'm trying to get to the bottom of a performance issue on a server
> running PostgreSQL 9.3.1 on Centos 5.

Hm ... it seems pretty suspicious that all of these examples take just
about exactly 1 second longer than you might expect. I'm wondering
if there is something sitting on an exclusive table lock somewhere,
and releasing it after 1 second.

In particular, this looks quite a bit like the old behavior of autovacuum
when it was trying to truncate empty pages off the end of a relation ---
it would hold off other accesses to the table until deadlock_timeout
elapsed, whereupon it'd get kicked off the exclusive lock (and have to
retry the truncation next time). Are you *sure* this server is running
9.3.1, and not something pre-9.3?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2014-04-28 17:52:41 Re: Slow queries on 9.3.1 despite use of index
Previous Message Michael van Rooyen 2014-04-28 17:12:31 Slow queries on 9.3.1 despite use of index