From: | jc_mich <juan(dot)michaca(at)paasel(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Doubt about join queries |
Date: | 2009-04-21 17:03:53 |
Message-ID: | 23160612.post@talk.nabble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thanks a lot! It works as good as I wish
Best regards.
Michael Nolan wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:04 PM, jc_mich <juan(dot)michaca(at)paasel(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>
>> The problem is not the formula, the problem is the join. I've summarized
>> it
>> because is a large formula and I've got right results
>>
>>
> You're quite correct that the problem is the join, because neither of the
> examples you gave have any code to limit the number of store records
> returned.
>
> You may need to include something like the following code fragment. (I'm
> using a 'distance' formula as a proxy for the latitude/longitude formula.)
>
> where store_no = (select store_no from store order by
> distance(store,customer) limit 1)
> --
> Mike Nolan
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Doubt-about-join-queries-tp23142980p23160612.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-04-21 17:13:38 | Re: trouble with to_char('L') |
Previous Message | Chris Worley | 2009-04-21 16:52:12 | COPY 'invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xff' |