| From: | "Leonardo Cezar" <lhcezar(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David BOURIAUD" <david(dot)bouriaud(at)ac-rouen(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: One more option for pg_dump... |
| Date: | 2008-02-25 14:28:42 |
| Message-ID: | 2315783e0802250628i6e9d3376ha96a7f16744a9359@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:48 AM, David BOURIAUD
<david(dot)bouriaud(at)ac-rouen(dot)fr> wrote:
> Could there be an option to pg_dump (let's say --function [func_name]) to be
> abble to dump the complete source code of a function in a separate file, or
> on the terminal ?
It's a TODO item. Just not to functions and so others (operators,
casts,...) objects as well.
I'm coding a fully functional prototype that solves these features.
Just now I'm going think in a way to dump overloaded functions that
seems me one more complicated issue.
> Do you think it could be a good thing ?
Yep! Hence it's a todo item :-)
> Are there workarounds to have the same comportement that I'm not aware of ?
Alot of lines sed+awk+pg_dump scripts ..
-Leo
--
Leonardo Cezar et all
http://www.dextra.com.br/postgres
http://www.postgresql.org.br
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-02-25 14:33:17 | Re: [HACKERS] Avahi support for Postgresql |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-02-25 14:27:33 | Re: Avahi support for Postgresql |