From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Planner hints in Postgresql |
Date: | 2014-03-17 17:24:21 |
Message-ID: | 23149.1395077061@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Possibly worth noting is that in past discussions, we've concluded that
>> the most sensible type of hint would not be "use this plan" at all, but
>> "here's what to assume about the selectivity of this WHERE clause".
>> That seems considerably less likely to break than any attempt to directly
>> specify plan details.
> Isnt using a user given value for selectivity a pretty risky situation as
> it can horribly screw up the plan selection?
And forcing a plan to be used *isn't* that? Please re-read the older
threads, since you evidently have not.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-03-17 17:26:26 | Re: Portability issues in shm_mq |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-03-17 17:19:41 | Re: on_exit_reset fails to clear DSM-related exit actions |