| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | nolan(at)celery(dot)tssi(dot)com |
| Cc: | mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com (Rajesh Kumar Mallah), peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net (Peter Eisentraut), pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: psql -e |
| Date: | 2003-07-24 14:42:24 |
| Message-ID: | 23086.1059057744@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
nolan(at)celery(dot)tssi(dot)com writes:
> Tom, would rewriting the output sections interfere with any changes
> you are/were working on in psql?
I'm not doing anything with psql ... Peter might be ...
> I probably won't have time to work on
> this before August 15th at this point, so maybe I should wait until we're
> ready to start on 7.5 stuff, in which case I may propose several changes
> in the definitions and options for both the echo and output options
> in psql.
I think throwing in another fflush or two would count as a bug fix.
Anything more extensive probably has to wait for the 7.5 cycle.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmitry Tkach | 2003-07-24 14:58:30 | Re: Limited varchar, unlimited varchar, or text? |
| Previous Message | nolan | 2003-07-24 14:39:31 | Re: psql -e |