From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Ron Peterson <rpeterson(at)yellowbank(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SPI & file locations |
Date: | 2000-05-26 16:12:55 |
Message-ID: | 2304.959357575@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Ron Peterson <rpeterson(at)yellowbank(dot)com> writes:
> After installation, shouldn't everything you need be in
> /usr/local/pgsql?
Yeah, it should really. We've had this discussion before. The real
problem is that no one wants to install the entire pgsql include tree,
but it's hard to draw the line at what an SPI extension might need or
not need. It doesn't help that we've been sloppy about what lives in
which include file, too :-(. Sooner or later someone should go through
the whole include tree and try to rearrange things so that there's a
fairly compact set of files that need to be exported.
In the meantime, pointing at the source tree is a good way to build SPI
extensions...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bryan White | 2000-05-26 16:16:13 | Re: PG 7.0 is 2.5 times slower running a big report |
Previous Message | Steve Wampler | 2000-05-26 16:09:01 | Re: Speed of locating tables? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-05-26 16:26:06 | Re: aliases break my query |
Previous Message | Karel Zak | 2000-05-26 16:06:47 | possible bug in RI? |