Re: BUG #5636: extra "(" or missing ")"

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "KOIZUMI Satoru" <koizumistr(at)minos(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #5636: extra "(" or missing ")"
Date: 2010-09-02 14:48:04
Message-ID: 23038.1283438884@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

"KOIZUMI Satoru" <koizumistr(at)minos(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp> writes:
> At 33.8.5. The decimal type of PostgreSQL 9.0RC1 Documentation, "(" is
> before "by means".
> But there is no ")".
> | the decimal type can be created either on the stack
> | or on the heap (by means of the functions
> | PGTYPESdecimal_new() and PGTYPESdecimal_free().

Fixed. It seemed to me the best way was to remove the ()'s from the
function names, since that style is used elsewhere, eg in the
description of ecpg's numeric type.

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-09-02 14:57:32 Re: BUG #5638: disagreement of argument name
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-09-02 14:40:19 Re: issue about information_schema REFERENTIAL_CONSTRAINTS