Re: Status report on writeable CTEs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Status report on writeable CTEs
Date: 2010-07-12 18:34:20
Message-ID: 23035.1278959660@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> writes:
> ... So what I'm now thinking of is making the planner plan that as a single
> Query, and make the planner expand it into multiple PlannedStmts if
> necessary. This would break the existing planner hooks, but I don't
> think that's a huge problem. Does anyone see any obvious flaws in this?

How will that interact with the existing rewriter? It sounds a lot
like a recipe for duplicating functionality ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Tiikkaja 2010-07-12 18:41:32 Re: Status report on writeable CTEs
Previous Message Marko Tiikkaja 2010-07-12 18:21:52 Re: Status report on writeable CTEs