Re: pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers-win32" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be
Date: 2004-02-04 23:38:18
Message-ID: 23028.1075937898@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32

"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
>> Put it into the macro that checks for query cancel.

> Are there other places that you know offhand that we should check for
> signals?

I'd like to think that that is the only place. There are places in the
code where we need to insert more cancel checks (I think the planner is
missing a few for instance) but there is not any justification for
cluttering things with a Windows-specific addition.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Natoli 2004-02-05 01:17:41 Re: win32 signals, part 4
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2004-02-04 23:34:08 Re: pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be