Re: Proposal: variant of regclass

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com, pavel(at)microolap(dot)com, andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: variant of regclass
Date: 2013-12-05 23:59:20
Message-ID: 23024.1386287960@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> Can I make sure that we want to keep the current behavior:

> test=# SELECT 'pg_klass'::regclass;
> ERROR: relation "pg_klass" does not exist

Yeah, I think the consensus is to not change the behavior of the input
functions, just add some new ones.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Freire 2013-12-06 00:23:11 Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2013-12-05 23:50:58 Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good