Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Date: 2002-10-02 15:06:31
Message-ID: 23009.1033571191@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> At 09:42 AM 2/10/2002 +1000, Philip Warner wrote:
>> Yes, and do the peripheral stuff to support old archives etc.

> Does silence mean people agree? Does it also mean someone is doing this
> (eg. whoever did the off_t support)? Or does it mean somebody else needs to
> do it?

It needs to get done; AFAIK no one has stepped up to do it. Do you want
to?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2002-10-02 15:09:10 Re: Purpose of rscale/dscale in NUMERIC?
Previous Message Roland Roberts 2002-10-02 14:48:45 Re: (Fwd) Re: Any Oracle 9 users? A test please...