Re: What's the difference?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: vitus(at)ice(dot)ru
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What's the difference?
Date: 2002-04-08 19:43:51
Message-ID: 23004.1018295031@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Victor Wagner <vitus(at)ice(dot)ru> writes:
>> Same results, but the second two constrain the planner's choice of join
>> order. See

>> http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.2/postgres/explicit-joins.html

>> Whether this is a feature or a bug depends on context...

>> regards, tom lane

> I can agree that this is feature if one uses natural or inner joins.

> But if query semantic needs outer joins there is no way to tell the
> planner that it is free to choose order of joining.

But it is *not* free to alter the join order of outer joins; if it does,
that will change the result. See the discussion on the above-linked
page.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message pgsql-bugs 2002-04-09 01:35:16 Bug #630: date/time storage problem: timestamp parsed incorrectly...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-04-08 19:32:16 Re: Full path to procedural language in the dump is a bug