From: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Steve Prentice <prentice(at)cisco(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: mixed, named notation support |
Date: | 2009-08-03 19:22:20 |
Message-ID: | 22F4E10A4E336B325652B25B@teje |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
--On Montag, August 03, 2009 12:38:48 -0400 Robert Haas
<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm a little confused here. We are 19 days into a 31 day CommitFest;
> you are almost three weeks too late to add a patch to the queue.
> Unless you can convince a friendly committer to pick this up out of
> sequence, I think the only patch that is under consideration here is
> the one that has been being discussed on this thread for the last 17
> days. I sent several notes adding for all patches to be added to
> commitfest.postgresql.org prior to the start of CommitFest; AFAIK,
> this one was never added.
Well, i already noted that in the "named and mixed notation" thread
actually two patches were involved, see
<http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-rrreviewers/2009-07/msg00016.php>.
Since Steve's changes were so small, i considered it to be an "extension"
to Pavels patch, without treating it separately to commit. In my opinion it
wouldn't make sense to commit those changes to plpgsql _without_ having
Pavels functionality. I have to admit that i saw Tom's complaint about
making AS a special keyword in plpgsql, but decided to leave the decision
wether we want to commit this or not up to a committer. I took the efforts
to get the attached patches there in a reviewable state then instead.
Please note that Steve's suggestion is linked into the commitfest since
2009-05-21, too.
--
Thanks
Bernd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bernd Helmle | 2009-08-03 19:29:18 | Re: bytea vs. pg_dump |
Previous Message | Steve Prentice | 2009-08-03 19:18:13 | Re: mixed, named notation support |