Re: pg_migrator to /contrib in a later 9.0 beta

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_migrator to /contrib in a later 9.0 beta
Date: 2010-05-06 20:12:45
Message-ID: 22997.1273176765@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> OK, seems people like pg_upgrade, but do we call it "pgupgrade" or
> "pg_upgrade"?

The latter. The former is unreadable.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2010-05-06 20:13:22 Re: pg_migrator to /contrib in a later 9.0 beta
Previous Message Thom Brown 2010-05-06 20:10:27 Re: pg_migrator to /contrib in a later 9.0 beta