| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Dunstan" <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc> |
| Cc: | "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: UUID data format 4x-4x-4x-4x-4x-4x-4x-4x |
| Date: | 2008-02-29 06:09:26 |
| Message-ID: | 22967.1204265366@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Tom Dunstan" <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc> writes:
> This seems like a good enough opportunity to mention an idea that I
> had while/after doing the enum patch. The patch was fairly intrusive
> for something that was just adding a type because postgresql isn't
> really set up for parameterized types other than core types. The idea
> would be to extend the enum mechanism to allow UDTs etc to be
> parameterized, and enums would just become one use of the mechanism.
Isn't this reasonably well covered by Teodor's work to support
typmods for user-defined types? We've discussed how the typmod could
be effectively a key into a system catalog someplace, thus allowing it
to represent more than just an int32 worth of stuff. I'm not seeing
where your proposal accomplishes more than that can.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2008-02-29 06:19:07 | Re: Batch update of indexes on data loading |
| Previous Message | Tom Dunstan | 2008-02-29 05:40:39 | Re: UUID data format 4x-4x-4x-4x-4x-4x-4x-4x |