| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Joshua Brindle <joshua(dot)brindle(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Joe Conway <joe(at)crunchydata(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: New Object Access Type hooks |
| Date: | 2022-04-05 02:10:50 |
| Message-ID: | 2295181.1649124650@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On Apr 4, 2022, at 1:47 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Perhaps libpq should be trying harder to make those cases look alike, but
>> this test is about server behavior not libpq behavior, so I'm inclined
>> to just make it lax.
> +1.
> I've gotten this test failure only a few times in perhaps the last six months, so if we narrow the opportunity for test failure without closing it entirely, we're just making the test failures that much harder to diagnose.
Done that way.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-04-05 02:12:19 | Re: Run pg_amcheck in 002_pg_upgrade.pl and 027_stream_regress.pl? |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-04-05 02:10:30 | Re: PATCH: add "--config-file=" option to pg_rewind |