From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Harald Armin Massa <haraldarminmassa(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [BUGS] Missing error message on missing ssl-key-files |
Date: | 2007-01-30 15:32:14 |
Message-ID: | 2295.1170171134@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> So I still tthink it's a good idea. Even though it doesn't solve every
> case, it solves a lot of them I think. And more importantly on that, I
> don't see how it would *break* anything (given that it still fires only
> when running as a service, when everything on stderr is just thrown away
> anyway). Do you see suhc a failure case?
The case I'm worried about is subprocess startup, where we haven't yet
been able to re-set any of these variables correctly. And yes, I think
it's an issue: if a DBA is expecting to find PG error messages in the
syslogger files, he's unlikely to go look in the eventlog.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-01-30 15:39:03 | Re: [BUGS] Missing error message on missing ssl-key-files |
Previous Message | Sergiy Vyshnevetskiy | 2007-01-30 15:29:25 | Re: BUG #2945: possibly forgotten SPI_push()/SPI_pop() |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-01-30 15:33:53 | Re: [HACKERS] Searching some sites explaing about PosgtreSQL |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-01-30 15:17:20 | Re: 10 weeks to feature freeze (Pending Work) |