| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers-oo(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers-oo(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] TABLEOID patch |
| Date: | 2000-07-01 17:55:56 |
| Message-ID: | 22943.962474156@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com> writes:
> Attached is the tableoid patch. If there are no objections can I have
> this applied?
I definitely object to the tests of tableoid that you have attached to
the inherit regress test. Don't you realize that anything that depends
on another installation matching the exact same OIDs you have is pretty
much guaranteed to fail?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-07-01 18:12:10 | Re: Bug in new memory system? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-07-01 17:37:21 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-07-01 20:49:46 | Re: to_date/char (fwd) |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-07-01 15:04:11 | Re: to_date/char (fwd) |