Re: Length of sql cols in postgresql

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jochem van Dieten <jochemd(at)oli(dot)tudelft(dot)nl>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Length of sql cols in postgresql
Date: 2002-09-02 15:18:32
Message-ID: 22928.1030979912@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Jochem van Dieten <jochemd(at)oli(dot)tudelft(dot)nl> writes:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> In 7.3, due out in a few months, the length will be 64.

> 64? Not 128 as per the SQL spec?
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2002-07/msg01275.php

This was beaten to death in a later thread; see eg.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2002-08/msg00399.php

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Padraic Renaghan 2002-09-02 16:03:03 Re: Batch Update updatecounts when error happens
Previous Message Jochem van Dieten 2002-09-02 15:00:43 Re: Length of sql cols in postgresql