| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.1 release notes |
| Date: | 2011-03-25 04:53:54 |
| Message-ID: | 22922.1301028834@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> In terms of future releases, I think we'd probably need to work a bit
> harder on the alpha release notes if we want to avoid the full release
> note generation process. That may be a good thing for us to consider
> in the future, but at least for this release I'd say we weren't quite
> there.
To my mind, one of the core ideas about the alpha releases was to be
able to pop them out with minimal overhead. It's *already* the case
that generating release notes is the most expensive part of the alpha
release process --- in fact, I'd venture that it's 90% or more of the
effort, just to produce the kind of notes we've produced for the past
alphas. I can't see that we're going to put significantly more effort
than that into them.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-03-25 15:38:18 | Re: 9.1 release notes |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-03-24 21:38:29 | Re: 9.1 release notes |