Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Date: 2000-05-04 07:30:32
Message-ID: 22889.957425432@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> This worry anyone? :)
> NOTICE: Index pg_group_sysid_index: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (0) IS NOT THE SAME AS HEAP' (1).
> Recreate the index.
> NOTICE: Index pg_group_name_index: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (0) IS NOT THE SAME AS HEAP' (1).
> Recreate the index.

Not if you had other transactions running in parallel with the
vacuum --- if the vacuum was the only thing running then I'd want
to know what you were doing before that...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2000-05-04 08:11:25 AW: libpq++ build now checks make rc
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-05-04 05:51:20 Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? )