From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_amcheck option to install extension |
Date: | 2021-04-19 16:53:29 |
Message-ID: | 228705.1618851209@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> OK, so let's fix it. If amcheck is going to stay in contrib then ISTM
> pg_amcheck should move there. I can organize that if there's agreement.
> Or else let's move amcheck as Alvaro suggests.
FWIW, I think that putting them both in contrib makes the most
sense from a structural standpoint.
Either way, though, you'll still need the proposed option to
let the executable issue a CREATE EXTENSION to get the shlib
loaded. Unless somebody is proposing that the extension be
installed-by-default like plpgsql, and that I am unequivocally
not for.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2021-04-19 16:57:57 | Re: More info on pg_stat_activity Wait Event Name when is DataFileRead |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-04-19 16:52:23 | Re: pg_amcheck option to install extension |