From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Ari Jolma <ajolma(at)water(dot)hut(dot)fi> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: table rename oddity |
Date: | 2000-05-25 15:15:33 |
Message-ID: | 22829.959267733@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Ari Jolma <ajolma(at)water(dot)hut(dot)fi> writes:
> Is this kind of behavior intended. When I try to rename a table to
> a reserved word - I have tried to use 'lseg' which is a type - postgres
> gives me an error but the change has been partly done and the
> only way back seems to be to go to the database directory and
> rename the file. I have tested this with version 7.0.
Boo hiss --- the physical file rename must be the *last* step in
table rename, after all other possible errors have been checked.
Evidently it's not :-(. Will fix.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-05-25 15:18:26 | Re: problem with NOTICE: _outNode: don't know how to print type |
Previous Message | Terry Van Belle | 2000-05-25 15:12:27 | Public Domain SQL grammars? |