From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier |
Date: | 2003-04-02 20:25:58 |
Message-ID: | 22819.1049315158@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Basically, one should only turn this variable on after giving up on the
>> possibility of getting any data out of the broken page itself. It would
>> be folly to run with it turned on as a normal setting.
> This statement should *definitely* go into the documentation for the
> option, then...
Andrew Sullivan expressed concern about this, too. The thing could
be made a little more failsafe if we made it impossible to set
ZERO_DAMAGED_PAGES to true in postgresql.conf, or by any means other
than an actual SET command --- whose impact would then be limited to
the current session. This is kind of an ugly wart on the GUC mechanism,
but I think not difficult to do with an assign_hook (it just has to
refuse non-interactive settings).
Comments?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-04-02 20:34:49 | Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-04-02 20:18:01 | Re: Dangling backends on win32 7.2.1 port (peerdirect). |