David Geier <geidav(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 11/3/22 15:50, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The bigger picture here is that we do actually endeavor to keep
>> (most of) our headers C++ clean, but our tool cpluspluscheck misses
>> these problems because it doesn't try to use these macros.
>> I wonder whether there is a way to do better.
> What about having a custom header alongside cpluspluscheck which
> references all macros we care about?
Can't see that that would help, because of the hand maintenance
required to make it useful.
regards, tom lane