| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction |
| Date: | 2023-06-06 20:20:40 |
| Message-ID: | 227976.1686082840@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> Since we're bikeshedding, "postgresql" or "builtin" could make it seem
> to a (app) developer that these may be recommended options, as we're
> trusting PostgreSQL to make the best choices for us. Granted, v16 is
> (theoretically) defaulting to ICU, so that choice is made, but the
> unsuspecting developer could make a switch based on that naming.
I don't think this is a problem, as long as any locale name other
than C/POSIX fails when combined with that provider name.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-06-06 20:22:30 | Re: Assert failure of the cross-check for nullingrels |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2023-06-06 20:14:41 | Re: Let's make PostgreSQL multi-threaded |