From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: dollar quoting nits |
Date: | 2004-02-24 16:16:30 |
Message-ID: | 22787.1077639390@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> 1. Is there any reason to exclude underscore as the first char of a
> dollar quoting delimiter (after the $), e.g. $_foo_$? I'm happy either
> way, just want to be as liberal as is reasonable.
I think we had agreed to "same rules as identifiers, except for $".
> 2. David Fetter asked me the other day if there was any limit on the
> length of the foo inside the $foo$. I glibly told him that I thought
> that we should treat it the same as identifiers, but I have pretty much
> convinced myself that this is wrong.
I agree, there is no reason to truncate.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen | 2004-02-24 16:43:52 | Avoid MVCC using exclusive lock possible? |
Previous Message | Jonathan M. Gardner | 2004-02-24 16:11:03 | Materialized View Summary |