Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos
Date: 2024-12-04 06:19:32
Message-ID: 2276817.1733293172@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> A couple of armv7 animals seemed to die in the Perl tests. Huh. Well
> I know that Perl was sensitive to this stuff but it passed on 32 bit
> CI (x86). I will try to reproduce that on local ARM hardware...

turaco seems unhappy because of

2024-12-04 05:37:14.831 GMT [9584:18] pg_regress/plperl_setup LOG: statement: CREATE EXTENSION plperl;
Util.c: loadable library and perl binaries are mismatched (got first handshake key 0xa300080, needed 0xa400080)

Not clear to me what these changes would have done to trigger that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-12-04 06:21:55 Re: Memory leak in WAL sender with pgoutput (v10~)
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2024-12-04 05:58:42 Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos