Re: WIP: About CMake v2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Date: 2015-08-29 21:14:17
Message-ID: 22768.1440882857@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2015-08-29 17:53:26 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Therefore, either we will not find any portability problems, or fixing
>> upstream those we do find will not be terribly difficult.

> Well, the difference to know is that we can't resolve that relatively
> quickly ourselves, but that it'd rather require $whoever installing a
> new version of cmake...

Yup. So one of the things we'd want to establish is what's the minimum
version of cmake we're going to require, and which (hopefully old)
platforms will we be leaving out in the cold with that?

I suspect it's premature to try to decide that now, but it's certainly
a question to keep in mind.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-08-29 21:36:32 Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-08-29 21:02:43 Re: WIP: About CMake v2