From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Create a GUC parameter temp_tablespacesthat allows selection of |
Date: | 2007-06-04 18:41:14 |
Message-ID: | 22765.1180982474@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> One of the main reasons for the implementation was to allow larger
> queries to work faster by utilising multiple temp tablespaces for the
> same query.
> The original ideal implementation was to use round-robin/cyclic
> selection, which allows much better usage in the above case.
Really? What if multiple backends are all hitting the same tablespaces
in the same order? A random selection seems much less likely to risk
having any self-synchronizing behavior.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-06-04 19:12:44 | Re: pgsql: Create a GUC parametertemp_tablespacesthat allows selection of |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-06-04 18:35:28 | Re: pgsql: Create a GUC parameter temp_tablespacesthat allows selection of |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-06-04 19:12:44 | Re: pgsql: Create a GUC parametertemp_tablespacesthat allows selection of |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-06-04 18:35:28 | Re: pgsql: Create a GUC parameter temp_tablespacesthat allows selection of |