Re: pgsql: Create a GUC parameter temp_tablespacesthat allows selection of

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Create a GUC parameter temp_tablespacesthat allows selection of
Date: 2007-06-04 18:41:14
Message-ID: 22765.1180982474@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> One of the main reasons for the implementation was to allow larger
> queries to work faster by utilising multiple temp tablespaces for the
> same query.

> The original ideal implementation was to use round-robin/cyclic
> selection, which allows much better usage in the above case.

Really? What if multiple backends are all hitting the same tablespaces
in the same order? A random selection seems much less likely to risk
having any self-synchronizing behavior.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-06-04 19:12:44 Re: pgsql: Create a GUC parametertemp_tablespacesthat allows selection of
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-06-04 18:35:28 Re: pgsql: Create a GUC parameter temp_tablespacesthat allows selection of

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-06-04 19:12:44 Re: pgsql: Create a GUC parametertemp_tablespacesthat allows selection of
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-06-04 18:35:28 Re: pgsql: Create a GUC parameter temp_tablespacesthat allows selection of