| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SCRAM in the PG 10 release notes |
| Date: | 2017-09-19 21:09:48 |
| Message-ID: | 2276.1505855388@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> writes:
> I'm not sure what exactly to do here. Where should we stick that notice?
> We could put it in the release notes, where the bullet point about SCRAM
> is, but it would be well hidden. If we want to give advice to people who
> might not otherwise pay attention, it should go to a more prominent
> place. In the "Migration to version 10" section perhaps. Currently, it
> only lists incompatibilities, which this isn't. Perhaps put the notice
> after the list of incompatibilities (patch attached)?
That seems pretty weird. I don't see a big reason not to just put it with
the bullet point about SCRAM. People who care will notice it there just
fine.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-09-19 21:12:45 | Re: Re: issue: record or row variable cannot be part of multiple-item INTO list |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-09-19 21:03:07 | Re: pgsql: Make new crash restart test a bit more robust. |