From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Andrus Moor" <kobruleht2(at)hot(dot)ee> |
Cc: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: index "pg_authid_rolname_index" is not a btree |
Date: | 2009-08-19 15:37:38 |
Message-ID: | 22757.1250696258@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Andrus Moor" <kobruleht2(at)hot(dot)ee> writes:
> Alvaro,
>> You can get around that particular problem by reindexing the pg_authid
>> table. But my guess is that you'll find that there's corruption
>> elsewhere that's not so easily recoverable ...
> Thank you.
> reindexing system tables and whole database succeeds.
> After that I can connect to database containing data to recover.
> However pg_dump fails:
> pg_dump: Error message from server: ERROR: could not identify an ordering
> operator for type name
Alvaro was right --- you've got damage in the system catalogs, not just
their indexes. This looks like missing entries in pg_amop. (You did
say you reindexed all the system catalogs, right? If not it's possible
this is only index damage, but I'm not very hopeful.)
I suspect that if you did get to the point of being able to run pg_dump
without error, you'd find just as much damage to the user data. I'm
afraid this database is toast and you should write it off as a learning
experience. Hardware fails, you need backups.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-08-19 15:54:07 | Re: text type has no default operator class for GIN? |
Previous Message | Bob Gobeille | 2009-08-19 15:26:14 | Re: text type has no default operator class for GIN? |