| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Steve Singer <ssinger(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [JDBC] JDBC connections to 9.1 |
| Date: | 2011-04-18 15:25:44 |
| Message-ID: | 22674.1303140344@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com> writes:
> On 18/04/11 15:57, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I am --- when I redid the GUC assign_hook logic a few weeks ago,
>> I changed the client_encoding code so that it shows the normalized
>> (official) name of the encoding, not whatever random string the client
>> sent over. For instance, previous versions:
> Am I right in thinking that would be that change committed on the 7th
> (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2011-04/msg00039.php) ?
Yes, that one.
> What concerns me
> most is that (assuming my dates are right) the JDBC driver has been
> broken for 11 days and no one noticed. This would lead me to believe
> that there is no JDBC build server. What would it take to set one up?
+1 for doing something along that line.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-04-18 15:33:47 | Re: Typed table DDL loose ends |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-04-18 15:24:04 | Re: [JDBC] JDBC connections to 9.1 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2011-04-18 15:42:30 | Re: [JDBC] JDBC connections to 9.1 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-04-18 15:24:04 | Re: [JDBC] JDBC connections to 9.1 |