Re: postgresql's MVCC implementation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kent Tong <kent(at)cpttm(dot)org(dot)mo>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql's MVCC implementation
Date: 2008-07-07 03:29:07
Message-ID: 22665.1215401347@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Kent Tong <kent(at)cpttm(dot)org(dot)mo> writes:
> Is MVCC not well defined?

It's not defined by the SQL standard, nor any other standard that I know
of. So yes, different implementations might mean subtly different
things by it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kent Tong 2008-07-07 03:41:55 Re: postgresql's MVCC implementation
Previous Message Kent Tong 2008-07-07 03:10:17 Re: postgresql's MVCC implementation