| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dim(at)tapoueh(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: mailing list redirect for bug numbers? |
| Date: | 2019-01-17 21:13:36 |
| Message-ID: | 22663.1547759616@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 7:28 PM Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>> Uhhh, no, the point here was to assign bug numbers for emails to -bugs
>> which *don't* go through the bugs form and therefore didn't have the bug
>> number info in the message.
> Without having the ability to properly merge bugs and to structured cross
> referencing and such, I think that's a really bad idea. That's going to
> cause more problems than it's fixing.
Agreed. If we have bug numbers assigned to messages that aren't bugs,
or are replies to bugs, it's just going to be a mess.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2019-01-18 14:35:05 | Re: mailing list redirect for bug numbers? |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2019-01-17 18:43:04 | Re: mailing list redirect for bug numbers? |