From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Clang function pointer type warnings in v14, v15 |
Date: | 2024-07-12 04:34:13 |
Message-ID: | 2261921.1720758853@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 2:26 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> I don't see any on clang 16 in the 12 and 13 branches. Where are you
>>> seeing them?
>> In the buildfarm. "adder" and a bunch of other machines are throwing
>> -Wcast-function-type in about two dozen places in v13, and "jay" is
>> emitting several hundred -Wdeprecated-non-prototype warnings.
> Ah, I see. A few animals running with -Wextra.
Oh, got it.
> I gess we have to decide if it's a matter for the tree, or for the
> people who add -Wextra, ie to decide if they want to filter that down
> a bit with some -Wno-XXX.
I think it's reasonable to say that if you add -Wextra then it's
up to you to deal with the results. If we were contemplating
enabling -Wextra as standard, then it'd be our problem --- but
nobody has proposed that AFAIR. In any case we'd surely not
add it now to near-dead branches.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2024-07-12 05:12:35 | Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2024-07-12 04:29:00 | Re: Clang function pointer type warnings in v14, v15 |