Re: Shutdown term

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Shutdown term
Date: 2001-03-13 20:34:26
Message-ID: 22615.984515666@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Seems like overkill to me. We could have the postmaster use SIGQUIT for
> db shutdown and leave SIGKILL for admin shutdown of individual backends.

Wrong... at least not with the current definitions of those signals!

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Lopez 2001-03-13 20:44:35 Escaping strings
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-13 20:31:36 Re: Shutdown term