Re: Postgres slower than MS ACCESS

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jay Greenfield" <jag(at)timberline(dot)ca>
Cc: "'Stephen Frost'" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres slower than MS ACCESS
Date: 2006-02-14 21:02:32
Message-ID: 22608.1139950952@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

"Jay Greenfield" <jag(at)timberline(dot)ca> writes:
> The table is 1.2 million rows X 246 columns. The only index is the primary
> key. I will try to remove that index to see if that improves performance at
> all.

Hmm, the large number of columns might have something to do with it ...
what datatypes are the columns?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2006-02-14 21:04:05 Re: SQL Function Performance
Previous Message Jay Greenfield 2006-02-14 20:56:18 Re: Postgres slower than MS ACCESS