Re: GCC vs clang

"Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> writes:
> Tom asked:
>> What happens to plperl?

> It still doesn't work. I was going to leave it out via --without-perl,
> and save fixing that for another day. There's a handful of other
> warnings when making, but --with-perl is the only showstopper
> (once the GNU_SOURCE problem is solved).

I'm hesitant to put in a patch that breaks plperl, even if it's for
a situation where you otherwise couldn't build at all; because plperl
would still be broken after the clang problem is resolved.

Better to get a fixed copy of clang.

regards, tom lane