From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: checking on buildfarm member thrush |
Date: | 2006-06-22 13:45:22 |
Message-ID: | 22569.1150983922@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm trying to determine why thrush has been failing on PG CVS HEAD for
>> the past few days. Could you try running the attached program on that
>> machine, and see what it prints? I suspect it will dump core :-(
> $ gcc -D_GNU_SOURCE tom.c -o tom
> $ ./tom
> failed: Success
Hmph. Well, that destroys the posix_fadvise-dumps-core theory, and
leaves us still wondering why thrush is failing "make check".
There's been a core dump recently introduced *somewhere*:
NOTICE: type reference hobbies_r.person%TYPE converted to text
LOG: server process (PID 2818) was terminated by signal 11
LOG: terminating any other active server processes
Could you get a gdb stack trace from that crash? If the buildfarm
run is under a suitable ulimit, it should be leaving a core file
in the test PGDATA directory.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-22 13:52:24 | Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted on Windows?) |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2006-06-22 13:39:54 | Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe |