Re: [PgFoundry] Unsigned Data Types [1 of 2]

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Ryan Bradetich" <rbradetich(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PgFoundry] Unsigned Data Types [1 of 2]
Date: 2008-09-09 12:11:45
Message-ID: 22555.1220962305@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

"Ryan Bradetich" <rbradetich(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I am assuming you are seeing this error in the uint_test1.sql:
> ERROR: could not find hash function for hash operator 16524
> I can bypass the error in uint_test1.sql by disabling the hash joins.
> I am going to dig in and figure out why the hashjoin operation is broken.

Well, the cause of that one would've been marking an operator as HASHES
without providing a hash opclass to back it up.

IIRC the test case involved ">"? That shouldn't even be marked HASHES
anyway ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brendan Jurd 2008-09-09 12:46:16 Re: [PATCHES] to_date() validation
Previous Message Brendan Jurd 2008-09-09 11:04:39 Re: [PATCHES] to_date() validation