From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org |
Date: | 2009-07-04 03:56:40 |
Message-ID: | 22554.1246679800@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
>>> It seems to be inconsistent. Probably because everything wound up
>>> with the same date, the order is probably more-or-less random.
>>
>> Yeah, I think that's what I'm seeing.
> I think what you guys must be seeing is that the topics are not in
> quite the same order. As far as I can tell, the ordering of patches
> within topics is absolutely identical.
No, what we're complaining about is the ordering of comments for a
single patch. If you look at
http://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=2
in some cases there are Comments before the Patch itself, and in
some cases after, but more often than not the original Patch is
at the bottom.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brendan Jurd | 2009-07-04 04:50:03 | Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-07-04 03:43:00 | Round-Robin Reviewers Needed |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brendan Jurd | 2009-07-04 04:50:03 | Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org |
Previous Message | Brendan Jurd | 2009-07-04 03:42:37 | Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org |