Re: Bitmap Indexes: request for feedback

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Gianni Ciolli <gianni(dot)ciolli(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>
Subject: Re: Bitmap Indexes: request for feedback
Date: 2008-10-22 14:00:23
Message-ID: 22551.1224684023@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I agree we could do the stream bitmap as well, but I'd suggest we should
> save that until the rest of the patch has been checked out.

Well, that would be a reasonable implementation path, but it's got
nothing to do with the patch as presented. The concern was getting
rid of some massive and ugly hacks in the executor ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-10-22 14:11:07 Re: Bitmap Indexes: request for feedback
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2008-10-22 13:53:45 Re: So what's an "empty" array anyway?